Share

Mann v. Kathuria, 2017 BCSC 229. Counsel led the defence in a Jury trial, and the British Columbia Supreme Court accepted Sudhir’s submission that the plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case could not claim the loss he allegedly suffered from having to sell his family home at an inopportune time because he was injured, not working, and needed the home sale proceeds to meet living expenses.

Associated
People
 
  • Sudhir K.
    Padmanabhan

    Partner

    Sudhir K.
    Padmanabhan

    Partner

Up Next...

Chaube v. Neja

Chaube v. Neja, 2017 BCSC 1415. A successful cross-examination of the plaintiff resulted in a complete dismissal of their claim, with costs.

JURISDICTION: British Columbia LEVEL OF COURT: Supreme Court of British Columbia
View Details